<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Types of Links that Will Get Your Site  Spidered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthony-yap.com/2005/06/01/drilling-down-on-the-types-of-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthony-yap.com/2005/06/01/drilling-down-on-the-types-of-links/</link>
	<description>Time-Tested Search Engine Optimization That Gets Results</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Expert &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Bowling and Search Engine Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.anthony-yap.com/2005/06/01/drilling-down-on-the-types-of-links/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Expert &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Bowling and Search Engine Rankings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 23:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthony-yap.com/?p=18#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] Google opened up this possibility when it started addressing the widespread link popularity manipulation of sites obtaining an excessive number of site-wide text links (notice we mentioned excessive, one or two small site-wides shouldn&#8217;t hurt but be careful about overdoing it). Google filtered these sites by penalizing or removing the site from its database. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google opened up this possibility when it started addressing the widespread link popularity manipulation of sites obtaining an excessive number of site-wide text links (notice we mentioned excessive, one or two small site-wides shouldn&#8217;t hurt but be careful about overdoing it). Google filtered these sites by penalizing or removing the site from its database. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Expert &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Optimization after the Jagger Update</title>
		<link>http://www.anthony-yap.com/2005/06/01/drilling-down-on-the-types-of-links/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Expert &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Optimization after the Jagger Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthony-yap.com/?p=18#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] Reciprocal linking appears to be on the decline as a linking strategy and effective link building has to come from a variety of links built using three-way linking, article submissions, press releases, and purchasing quality one-way links. This truly is the better way to maintain high rankings long-term. While reciprocal linking strategies work for Yahoo and MSN at the moment, it&#8217;s likely that time will change this as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reciprocal linking appears to be on the decline as a linking strategy and effective link building has to come from a variety of links built using three-way linking, article submissions, press releases, and purchasing quality one-way links. This truly is the better way to maintain high rankings long-term. While reciprocal linking strategies work for Yahoo and MSN at the moment, it&#8217;s likely that time will change this as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

